J. For. Sci., 2009, 55(4):171-176 | DOI: 10.17221/52/2008-JFS

A GIS-MCE based model for forest road planning

E. Abdi1, B. Majnounian1, A. Darvishsefat1, Z. Mashayekhi1, J. Sessions2
1 Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
2 Department of Forest Engineering, Oregon State university, oregon, U.S.A.

One of the cost factors in forest management is the development of road infrastructure. The objective of study was to develop a method using GIS and Multi-criteria Evaluation (MCE) to design a forest road network with the lowest construction cost while maintaining other technical requirements. Six road alternatives meeting technical requirements were developed using PEGGER. Then MCE was used to evaluate the construction costs of the candidate networks. The decision making group identified six factors as being relevant to the costs of forest roads. Then factors were compared in a pair-wise comparison, in the context of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to develop weights of map layers. Then weights and factors were entered into the MCE module to create a final suitability map. The total cost of each alternative was extracted from the suitability map and the unit cost of each alternative was calculated. The results showed that alternatives one and two had the highest and lowest unit costs, respectively. The results illustrated the utility of using GIS and MCE to improve the planning process.

Keywords: analytic hierarchy process; forest road; GIS; multi-criteria evaluation (MCE); PEGGER

Published: April 30, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Abdi E, Majnounian B, Darvishsefat A, Mashayekhi Z, Sessions J. A GIS-MCE based model for forest road planning. J. For. Sci. 2009;55(4):171-176. doi: 10.17221/52/2008-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ABELI W.S., MEILUDIE O., KACHWELE R., 2000. Road alignment and gradient issues in the maintenance of logging roads in Tanzania. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 11: 22-29.
    2. ACZEL J., SAATY T.L., 1983. Procedure for synthesizing ratio judgments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 27: 93-102. Go to original source...
    3. CHUNG W., SESSIONS J., HEINIMANN H.R., 2004. An application of a heuristic network algorithm to cable logging layout design. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 15: 11-24. Go to original source...
    4. COULTER E.D., SESSIONS J., MICHAEL W.G., 2003. Scheduling Forest Road Maintenance Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Heuristics. Silva Fennica, 40: 143-160. Go to original source...
    5. COULTER E.D., COAKLEY J., SESSIONS J., 2006. The analytic hierarchy process: A tutorial for use in prioritizing forest road investments to minimize environmental effects. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 17: 51-70. Go to original source...
    6. DEAN D.J., 1997. Finding optimal routes for networks of harvest site access roads using GIS-based techniques. Canadian Journal of Forest Resources, 27: 11-22. Go to original source...
    7. EASTMAN J.R., 1995. Decision Support. In: Idrisi for Windows: User's guide version 1.0. Clark Labs for Cartographic Technology and Geographic Analysis. Clark University, Worcester, Mass: 10.1.10.6.
    8. ELIAS G.B., 2001. Guidelines for low impact forest roads. Bureau of Forest Management Project, Indonesian Ministry of Forestry: 47.
    9. EPSTEIN R., WEINTRAUB A., SESSIONS J.B., SESSIONS J., SAPUNAR P., NETO E., 2006. A combinatorial heuristic approach for solving real size machinery location and road design problems in forestry planning. Operations Research, 54: 1017-1027. Go to original source...
    10. HUANG B., LONG C.R., YONG S.L., 2003. GIS_AHP model for HAZMAT routing with security considerations. IEEE 6th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation System. Shanghai, IEEE ITS Council: 1-6.
    11. IRANIAN PLAN, BUDGET ORGANIZATION, 2000. Forest road Project Guidelines No. 148. 2nd Ed. Office of the Deputy for Technical Affairs. Bureau of Technical Affairs and Standards. Iranian Plan and Budget Publication. (In Persian)
    12. KIRBY M., HAGER W., WONG P., 1986. Simultaneous planning of wildland management and transportation alternatives. Management Science and Studies, 21: 371-387.
    13. LIU K., SESSIONS J., 1993. Preliminary planning of road systems using digital terrain models. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 4: 27-32. Go to original source...
    14. MURRAY A.T., 1998. Route planning for harvest site access. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28: 1084-1087. Go to original source...
    15. MURTHY A.R., 2003. Selection of least cost paths for extraction of forest produce using remote sensing and GIS. Map India Conference. New Delhi, GIS Development: 1-9.
    16. PICARD N., GAZULL L., FREYCON V., 2006. Finding optimal routes for harvesting tree access. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 17: 35-48. Go to original source...
    17. RAO B.R., DWIVEDI R.S., VENKATARATNAM L., RAVISHANKAR T., THAMMAPPA S., BHARGAVA G., 1991. Mapping the magnitude of sodicity in part of the Indo-Gangetic plains of Uttar Pradesh, northern India using Landsat data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 12: 419-425. Go to original source...
    18. ROGERS L., 2001. PEGGER & ROADVIEW - A New GIS Tool To Assist Engineers in Operations Planning. The International Mountain Logging and 11th Pacific Northwest Skyline Symposium, Seattle, University of Washington: 177-182.
    19. ROGERS L., 2005. Automating aontour-based route projection for preliminary forest road designs using GIS. [MS Thesis.] Washington, University of Washington: 87.
    20. SAATY T.L., 2000. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Vol. VI. The AHP. Pittsburgh, RWS Publications: 478.
    21. SHIBA M., 1995. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) based multi attribute benefit structure analysis of road network system in mountainous rural areas of Japan. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 7: 14-50. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content