J. For. Sci., 2008, 54(7):321-332 | DOI: 10.17221/35/2008-JFS
Production potential of Douglas fir at mesotrophic sites of Křtiny Training Forest Enterprise
- Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
: The study evaluates production parameters (height, diameter at breast height, volume) of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) at mesotrophic sites of the Křtiny Training Forest Enterprise in mature stands. In total, 29 mixed stands were assessed with the registered proportion of Douglas fir at an age of 85 to 136 years. Comparing the 10 largest Douglas firs with the 10 largest spruces or larches higher, and as a rule markedly higher, production potential of introduced Douglas fir was found in all assessed stands. There were also groups of trees where the volume of Douglas fir was twice to 3 times higher than the volume of spruce or larch (see Tabs. 5 to 10). For example, in stand 177B11, the mean volume of 9.12 m3 was recorded in the 10 largest Douglas fir trees but the volume of spruce reached only 3.17 m3 and the volume of larch was 3.70 m3. Differences in mensurational parameters of Douglas fir found on the one hand and of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) or European larch (Larix decidua Mill.) on the other hand compared by ANOVA tests were statistically highly significant. Annual ring analyses have shown that at present the volume increment of particular Douglas fir trees ranges from 0.12 to 0.16 m3 per year in mature stands (i.e. about 1.5 m3 every 10 years).
Keywords: Douglas fir; Norway spruce; European larch; production potential; mesotrophic sites
Published: July 31, 2008 Show citation
References
- Blaščák V., 2003. Zkušenosti s pěstováním douglasky tisolisté na LS Vodňany. Lesu zdar, 9: 10-11.
- Burgbacher H., Greve P., 1996. 100 Jahre Douglasienanbau im Stadtwald Freiburg. AFZ, 20: 1109-1111.
- Dolejský V., 2000. Najde douglaska větší uplatnění v našich lesích? Lesnická práce, 11: 492-494.
- Fowells H.A., 1965. Silvics of Forest Trees of the United States. Washington D.C., USDA, Forest Service: 546-553.
- Hofman J., 1964. Pěstování douglasky. Praha, SZN: 253.
- Huss J., 1996. Die Douglasie als Mischbaumart. AFZ, 20: 1112.
- Kantor P., Knott R., Martiník A., 2001. Production capacity of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii /Mirb./ Franco) in a mixed stand. Ekológia, Supplement 1: 5-14.
- Kenk G., Ehring A., 1995. Tanne - Fichte - Buche oder Douglasie? AFZ, 11: 567-569.
- Martiník A., 2004. Produkční potenciál a ekologická stabilita douglasky tisolisté (Pseudotsuga menziesii /Mirb./ Franco) v chlumních oblastech České republiky. [Doktorská dizertační práce.] Brno, MZLU, LDF: 152.
- Sedláček T., 2001. Produkční potenciál douglasky tisolisté na ŠLP Masarykův les Křtiny. [Diplomová práce.] Brno, MZLU, LDF: 47.
- Šika A., Vinš. B., 1980. Růst douglasky v lesních porostech ČSR. Práce VÚLHM, 57: 73-95.
- Škoda J., 1977. Pěstební zhodnocení douglaskového porostu 264 a3, pěstební středisko Olomučany, ŠLP Křtiny. [Diplomová práce.] Brno, VŠZ: 86.
- Wolf J., 1998. Jak rostl nejstarší porost douglasky u Písku. Lesnická práce, 5: 182-183.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

