J. For. Sci., 2005, 51(20):49-53 | DOI: 10.17221/11849-JFS

Fertilization of Norway spruce plantations on the bulldozer-spread windrows in the Ore Mts.Original Paper

J. Remeš, V. V. Podrázský, I. Ulbrichová, V. Meduna
Faculty of Forestry and Environment, Czech University of Agriculture in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

The spreading of bulldozer-formed windrows represents a second stage of the site restoration with bulldozers utilization in the Ore Mts. In the first period, bulldozers were used to create windrows for mechanized reforestation of immission-declined stands, causing profound devastation of forest sites, because removed surface humus was the only source of nutrients and environment for tree species roots. Preparatory stands have been established, and have to undergo re-construction in the coming years. Nowadays, the windrows are spread by the bulldozers again, covering 1/3 f the whole area between windrows by the rest of holorganic matter. This substratum is impoverished by the extensive mineralization and connected nutrient (especially N) losses, representing differently suitable space for tree rooting. Presented paper documents the effects of fertilization by different types of the SILVAMIX fertilizer on the growth and prosperity of new spruce plantations. Effects of fertilization are visible very soon and they are significantly beneficial for the new forest plantations.

Keywords: Ore Mts., site preparation; tree species growth; fertilization; tree nutrition; Silvamix

Published: December 31, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Remeš J, Podrázský VV, Ulbrichová I, Meduna V. Fertilization of Norway spruce plantations on the bulldozer-spread windrows in the Ore Mts. J. For. Sci. 2005;51(Special Issue):49-53. doi: 10.17221/11849-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. BALLARD T.M., 1988. Soil degradation associated with forest site preparation. In: Degradation of Forested Land: Forest Soils at Risk. Victoria, B.C. Ministry of Forests: 74-81.
  2. BINKLEY D., 1986. Forest Nutrition Management. New York, J. Wiley: 289.
  3. BURGER J.A., 1983. Physical impact of harvesting and site preparation on soil. In: Maintaining Forest Site Productivity. Clemson, SC, Soc. of Foresters: 3-11.
  4. JIRGLE J., 1984. Příčiny chřadnutí některých kultur náhradních dřevin v Krušných horách. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 26 (2): 15-21.
  5. MORAVČÍK P., MORAVČÍKOVÁ D., 1994. Biomasa porostu břízy, smrku pichlavého, smrku ztepilého a jeřábu v Krušných horách. [Závěrečná zpráva.] Ústav pro výzkum lesních ekosystémů: 21.
  6. PODRÁZSKÝ V., ULBRICHOVÁ I., MOSER W.K., 2001. Ecological impact analysis of mechanised site preparation techniques. Journal of Forest Science, 47, Special Issue: 146-149.
  7. PODRÁZSKÝ V.V., REMEŠ J., ULBRICHOVÁ I., 2003. Biological and chemical amelioration effects on the localities degraded by bulldozer site preparartion in the Ore Mts. - Czech Republic. Journal of Forest Science, 49: 141-147. Go to original source...
  8. REMEŠ J., ULBRICHOVÁ I., PODRÁZSKÝ V., 2002. Ekologické nároky a funkční význam smrku pichlavého. Lesnická práce, 81: 306-307.
  9. REMEŠ J., VIEWEGH J., PODRÁZSKÝ V., VACEK S., 2004. Výsledky aplikace hnojiv řady SILVAMIX v lesních porostech. Lesnická práce, 83: 25-27.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.