J. For. Sci., 2005, 51(7):305-311 | DOI: 10.17221/4566-JFS

Structure and functions of the types of Norway spruce (Picea abies[L.] Karst.) roots

R. Gebauer, M. Martinková
Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

The aim of the study was to describe variability of the structure of roots in Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) from their growth tips to the stem foot, i.e. anchor roots in relation to their changing functions. Histology and anatomy of plant organs were dealt with by the innumerable number of authors and fundamentals of knowledge in these disciplines have become the self-evident part of botany textbooks. The description of primary and secondary structure of roots is explained in many textbooks by means of drawings depicting the mutual position of particular systems of tissues. However, it refers mostly to the structure of herb roots in either Magnoliophytes or Liliophytes. Naturally, the structure of tree roots does not substantially differ from herb species. A certain problem is related to the secondary thickening of roots, their ramification, anastomosis and changes in the structure which are enforced by tension and pressure forces; these forces affect the roots during their mechanical load, e.g. by solifluction, soil load and compaction or through their above-ground systems. Trees can be stressed by wind gusts, snow cover, glazed frost and a number of other factors. Therefore, the structure of roots changes in the course of time as well as due to the increasing weight of the stem and crown. In terms of histological structure Norway spruce roots were studied within a forest stand in the area of the Křtiny Training Forest Enterprise, viz. Vranov Forest District (49°19´484´´N, 16°47´629´´E). Root systems were exposed with an air blast using the AIR-SPADE tool (nadezhdina, čermák 2003) and cuts of buttress roots, horizontal roots, root anastomosis and fine roots were selected. Histological studies were focused on manual transversal cuts of fine roots.

Keywords: histology; primary roots; secondary structure; Picea abies (L.) Karst.

Published: July 31, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Gebauer R, Martinková M. Structure and functions of the types of Norway spruce (Picea abies[L.] Karst.) roots. J. For. Sci. 2005;51(7):305-311. doi: 10.17221/4566-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. BHANDARI N.N., 1997. Staining techniques. A Manual. New Delhi, Ultimate printers: 344.
  2. BJÖRKHEM U., LUNDEBERG G., SCHOLANDER J., 1975. Root distribution and compressive strength in forest soils. Root mapping and plate loading in stands of Norway spruce at the thinning stage. Paper och Uppsatser Instituut Fr. Växtekologi och Marklära: 22.
  3. BORATYNSKI A., BUGALA W. et al., 1998. Biologia świerka pospolitego. Poznań, Bogucki Wydawnictvo Naukowe: 781.
  4. CHAMONIKOLA K. et al., 1999. Od gotiky k renesanci. Díl II. Brno, Moravská galerie v Brně: 663.
  5. DUBBEL V., YINDEL U., EICHHORN J., 1990. Sturmschäden in Frühjahr 1990 in Hessen. Forschungsbericht Hessische Forstliche Versuchsanstalt, 12: 160.
  6. ESAU K., 1965. Plant anatomy. 2nd edition. New York, John Wiley & Sons: 767.
  7. GRAHAM B.F., BORMANN F.H., 1966. Natural root grafts. Botanical Review, 32: 255-292. Go to original source...
  8. HEJNOWICZ Z., 1973. Anatomia rozwojowa drzew. Warszawa, PWN.
  9. JENÍK J., 1957. Kořenový systém dubu letního a zimního (Quercus robur L. et Q. petraea Liebl.). Praha, Rozpravy Československé Akademie Věd, Přírodní vědy, 67: 1-85.
  10. JENÍK J., 1964. Morphology of root systems in trees: a proposal for terminology. In: SEN D. N. (ed.), Tenth International Botanical Congress, Edinburgh, Abstracts: 393-394.
  11. JENÍK J., 1974. Adventivní kořeny u nahosemenných a dvouděložných rostlin. Opava, Časopis Slezského muzea, ser. C, 23: 153-163.
  12. KERN K.G., MOLL W., BRAUN H.J., 1961. Wurzeluntersuchungen in Rein- und Mischbeständen des Hochschwarzwaldes (Vfl. Todtmoos 2/I-IV). Allgemeine Forstund Jagdzeitung, 132: 241-260.
  13. KOZLOWSKI T.T., 1971. Growth and development of trees. Vol. II - Cambial Growth, Root Growth and Reproductive Growth. New York, London, Academic Press: 514.
  14. LADEFOGED K., 1943. Virkning af Törkeperioder. Dansk Skovforenings Tidsskrift, 28: 389-428.
  15. NADEZHDINA N., ČERMÁK J., 2003. Instrumental methods for studies of structure and function of root systems in large trees. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54: 1511-1521. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. NĚMEC B. et al., 1962. Botanická mikrotechnika. Praha, Nakladatelství ČSAV.
  17. NĚMEČEK J. et al., 2001. Taxonomický systém půd České republiky. Praha, ČZU.
  18. OKOLÓW C., 1978. Uszkadzania systemów korzeniowych drzew spowodowane nadmiernym ruchem turystycznym w Bialowieskim Parku Narodowym. Sylwan, 122: 63-71.
  19. PAZOUREK J., VOTRUBOVÁ O., 1997. Atlas of Plant Anatomy. Prague, PERES Publishers, Series in Natural History, 3: 447.
  20. PRASAD B.K., 1986. Staining technique in botany. DEHRA DUN, International book distributors: 107.
  21. SCHWEINGRUBER F.H., 1996. Tree Rings and Environment Dendroecology. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, WSL/FNP, Birmensdorf, Berne, Stuttgart, Vienna, Haupt: 609.
  22. SUTTON R.F., TINUS R.W., 1983. Root and root system terminology. Forest ScienceMonograph, No. 24, ref. Supplement to Forest Science, 29: 137.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.