J. For. Sci., 2004, 50(11):520-525 | DOI: 10.17221/4650-JFS

A new concept in sustainable forest management - the need for forest ecosystem and landscape research

J. Kulhavý
Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry, Brno, Czech Republic

The greatest advance in ecosystem research was made in the last century. The development and acceptance of forest ecology by foresters occurred because it provided a means for recognizing, understanding, classifying and mapping the natural variation of forests. Forest ecology involved studies at the individual, population, community, and ecosystem levels but such studies always needed to involve the ecosystem concept. Today, the new concept of "ecosystem and landscape forestry" integrating ecological and socio-economic research has been developed on the basis of EU COST Action E-25 European Network for a Long-term Forest Ecosystem and Landscape Research Programme. An analysis has been carried out of the present situation in forest research in the Czech Republic. The need for forest ecosystem and landscape research is obvious.

Keywords: sustainable forest management; forest ecology; ecosystem research; landscape research

Published: November 30, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kulhavý J. A new concept in sustainable forest management - the need for forest ecosystem and landscape research. J. For. Sci. 2004;50(11):520-525. doi: 10.17221/4650-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. ANDERSSON F. et al., 2000. Forest ecosystem research - priorities for Europe. Forest Ecol. Mgmt, 132: 111-119. Go to original source...
  2. BEGON M., HARPER J.L., TOWNSEND C.R., 1990. Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities. Second Edition. London, Blackwell Scientific Publications: 945. Instrument for the Assessment of Nature Oriented Silviculture. In: IRSLINGER R. (ed.), Nature Oriented Forest Management in Central Europe. EFI Summer School at Rottenburg University, 21-28 September 1997. Rottenburg a. N. RUF Rottenburg University of Applied Forestry (Schriftenreihe der FHR; Nr. 07-97): 7-28.
  3. KIMMINS J.P., 1987. Forest Ecology. New York, Macmillan Publishing Company, Division of Macmillan: 531.
  4. MARELL A., LAROUSSINIE O., KRAUCHI N., MATTEUCCI G., ANDERSSON F., LEITGEB E., 2003. Scientific issues related to sustainable forest management in an ecosystem and landscape perspective. Technical Report 1, COST Action E-25, ECOFOR, Paris.
  5. ODUM, E.P., 1971. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science, 164: 262-270. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. OTTO H.J., 1994. Waldökologie. Stuttgart, Ulmer Verlag: 391.
  7. SLODIČÁK M., 1997. Silvicultural problems in the Czech Republic. Proc. of the XIth World Forestry Congress, 13-22 October 1997: 6.
  8. SPURR S.H., BARNES B.V., 1980. Forest Ecology. New York, John Willey & Sons: 687.
  9. SUKACHEV V.N., 1959. The correlation between the concepts forest ecosystem and forest biogeocoenose and their importance for the classification of forest. Silva Fenn., 105: 94-97.
  10. VANČURA K., 1997. The status on Czech forest genetic resources. Proc. of the XIth World Forestry Congress, 13-22 October 1997: 6.
  11. WARING R.H., SCHLESINGER W.H., 1985. Forest Ecosystems. Concepts and Management. Orlando, Florida, Academic Press, Inc.: 340.
  12. WARING R.H., RUNNING S.V., 1998. Forest Ecosystems. Analysis at Multiple Scales. San Diego, California, Academic Press: 370.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.