J. For. Sci., 2002, 48(9):415-424 | DOI: 10.17221/11903-JFS

Habitat features of the capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) leks in the West CarpathiansOriginal Paper

M. Saniga
Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Research Station Staré Hory, Slovak Republic

Habitat characteristics of 43 capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) leks were studied in the mountains of Central Slovakia (West Carpathians) in 1984-2002. Macro-habitat was described with respect to topography and succession stage. Micro-habitat was described with respect to forest type and forest stand structure. Twenty-seven out of forty-three display grounds were situated in the upper half of the lateral ridges. Sixteen leks were located on hills of the lateral ridges (slope < 10%). All the leks were situated in old succession stages of the forest (80-200 years old). Twenty-seven display grounds were located in natural forests, sixteen leks were situated in man-managed stands more than 80 years old. Leks were situated in a variety of forest types with overstorey tree-density between 400-1,050 stems per ha. Distribution of leks was limited above all by macro-habitat characteristics (elevated sites, old stands). Age-space structure seemed to be a significant micro-habitat feature (preference of multi-layered stands).

Keywords: capercaillie; Tetrao urogallus; lek; habitat; West Carpathians

Published: September 30, 2002  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Saniga M. Habitat features of the capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) leks in the West Carpathians. J. For. Sci. 2002;48(9):415-424. doi: 10.17221/11903-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. EIBERLE K., 1974. Waldkundliche Aspekte der Forschung an Rauhfusshühnern. Schweiz. Z. Forstwirtsch., 125: 147-170.
    2. EIBERLE K., 1976. Zur Analyse eines Auerwildbiotops im Schweizerischen Mittelland. Forstwiss. Cbl., 95: 108-124. Go to original source...
    3. HINTZE J.L., 1997. NCSS '97 - Statistical system for Windows. User's Guide 1,2. Number Clutcher Statistical Systems, Kaysville, Utah: 1716.
    4. HJORTH I., 1982. Attributes of capercaillie display grounds and the influence of forestry. In: LOVEL T. (ed.), Proc. Int. Symp. Grouse, 1: 26-35.
    5. HJORTH I., 1985. The distribution of capercaillie males on leks in relation to the forest structure of the recruiting area. In: LOVEL T., HUDSON P. (eds.), Proc. Int. Symp. Grouse, 3: 217-235.
    6. KLAUS S., BERGMANN H.H., ANDREEV A.V., MÜLLER F., PORKERT J., WIESNER J., 1986. Die Auerhühner. Wittenberg-Lutherstadt, Ziemsen Verlag: 276.
    7. LARSEN B.B., WEGGE P., 1985. Habitat characteristics of territorial capercaillie cocks during the breeding season. In: LOVEL T., HUDSON P. (eds.), Proc. Int. Symp. Grouse, 3: 236-246.
    8. LEWIS R.A., 1981. Characteristics of persistent and transient territorial sites of male blue grouse. J. Wildl. Mgmt, 45: 1048-1051. Go to original source...
    9. MOSS R., PICOZZI N., 1994. Management of forests for capercaillie in Scotland. For. Comm. Bull., 113: 1-32.
    10. MÜLLER F., 1974. Die wichtigsten Ergebnisse 10jähriger Auer-wild-Forschung im hessischen Bergland. Allg. Forstz., 29 (39): 834-836.
    11. MÜLLER F., 1978. Rauhfusshühner als Biotop-Indikatoren. In: HOFFMANN R.R. (ed.), Wildbiologische Informationen für den Jäger. Jagd u. Hege Ausbildungsbuch II. Stuttgart, Ferdinand Enke Verlag: 57-68.
    12. RANDU©KA D., VOREL J., PLĶVA K., 1986. Fytocenológia a lesnķcka typológia. Bratislava, Prķroda: 339.
    13. ROLSTAD J., WEGGE P., 1987. Habitat characteristics of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus display grounds in southeastern Norway. Holarct. Ecol., 10: 219-229. Go to original source...
    14. SANIGA M., 1996a. Habitat characteristics of capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) leks in Central Slovakia. Biológia (Bratislava), 51: 191-199.
    15. SANIGA M., 1996b. Distribution, habitat preferences and breeding biology of the capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) population in the Veµkį Fatra Mountains (West Carpathians). Biológia (Bratislava), 51: 201-211.
    16. SCHERZINGER W., 1976. Rauhfuss-Hühner. Schriftenreihe des Bayerischen Staatsministeriums für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten. Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald, Heft 2: 1-85.
    17. SCHRÖDER W., 1974. Über den Einfluss der Forstwirtschaft auf das Auerhuhn in den Bayerischen Alpen. Allg. Forstz., 29 (39): 825-828.
    18. SCHRÖDER W., ZEIMENTZ K., FELDNER R., 1982. Das Auerhuhn in Bayern. Scr.-R. Bayer. Landesamt. Umweltsch., 49: 1-105.
    19. SEISKARI P., 1962. On the winter ecology of capercaillie, Tetrao urogallus, and black grouse, Lyrurus tetrix, in Finland. Pap. Game Res., 22: 1-119.
    20. VALKEAJÄRVI P., IJÄS L., 1986. On the display requirements of capercaillie in Central Finland. Suomen Riista, 33: 5-18.
    21. WEGGE P., ROLSTAD J., 1986. Size and spacing of capercaillie leks in relation to social behavior and habitat. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 19: 401-408. Go to original source...
    22. ZAR J.H., 1996. Biostatistical analysis. Third edition. New Jersey, Uppersaadle River, Prentice Hall: 662.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content