J. For. Sci., 2002, 48(4):150-155 | DOI: 10.17221/11868-JFS

Point distribution form model for spruce stems (Picea abies [L.] Karst.)Original Paper

M. Křepela
Czech University of Agriculture, Faculty of Forestry, Prague, Czech Republic

The paper deals with the construction of a point distribution form model for spruce stems. This model is based on the principal components analysis of variance-covariance matrix formed for the Procrustes residuals. The calculation of full Procrustes co-ordinates, the principal components, is demonstrated on an example of a spruce experimental plot at premature age, and a point distribution model is constructed for the first three components. The parameters of the model are evaluated in relation to Konšel's (Kraft's) tree classes, normality of their classification is tested, maxima and minima are demonstrated on actual trees. The complete stem shape analysis of all four samples is also provided. A special model is constructed for these samples and the course of the parameters of this model is graphically represented.

Keywords: Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.); stem shape; Procrustes analysis; principal components analysis; point distribution form model

Published: April 30, 2002  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Křepela M. Point distribution form model for spruce stems (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). J. For. Sci. 2002;48(4):150-155. doi: 10.17221/11868-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. BOOKSTEIN F.L., 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. Cambridge, New York, Port Chester, Melbourne, Sydney, Cambridge University Press: 435.
    2. COOTES T.F., TAYLOR C.J., COOPER D.H., GRAHAM J., 1992. Training models of shape from sets of examples. In: HOGG D.C., BOYLE R.D. (eds.), British Machine Vision Conference. Berlin, Springer Verlag: 9–18. Go to original source...
    3. COOTES T.F., TAYLOR C.J., COOPER D.H., GRAHAM J., 1994. Image search using flexible shape models generated from sets of examples. In: MARDIA K.V. (ed.), Statistics and Images: Vol. 2. Oxford, Carfax: 1–18. Go to original source...
    4. DRYDEN I.L., MARDIA K.V., 1998. Statistical Shape Analysis. Chichester, New York, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto, John Wiley & Sons: 345.
    5. HAVRÁNEK T., 1993. Statistika pro biologické a lékaøské vìdy. Praha, Academia: 478.
    6. KONŠEL J., 1931. Struèný nástin tvorby a pìstìní lesù v biologickém ponìtí. Písek: 552.
    7. KØEPELA M., SEQUENS J., ZAHRADNÍK D., 2001. Dendrometric evaluation of stand structure and stem forms on Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) sample plots Doubravèice 1, 2, 3. J. For. Sci., 47: 419–427.
    8. KORF V. et al., 1972. Dendrometrie. Praha, SZN: 371.
    9. METRIGUARD INC., 2001. www.metriguard.com.
    10. ROHLF J.F., 1998. TpsRegr Version 1.20, Statistic software.
    11. ROHLF J.F., 2001. http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph.
    12. THOMPSON D.W., 1917. On Growth and Form. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 280.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content