J. For. Sci., 2010, 56(2):84-91 | DOI: 10.17221/32/2009-JFS

Analysis of the accuracy of GPS Trimble JUNO ST measurement in the conditions of forest canopy

M. Klimánek
Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

GPS Trimble JUNO ST was tested at 16 points under forest canopy. The measurements were done on three different dates of the growing seasons in 2007 and 2008. On each date, 4 recordings were measured in the length of 1, 2, 5, and 10 minutes with the recording frequency of 5 seconds. The resultant data were statistically evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) both for data before corrections and for data after post-process corrections from the reference station. The tested GPS receiver reaches the average mean square error of the measurement of XY coordinates in the interval of 2.7 up to 5.1 m (without corrections and depending on the time of observation). The error of the altitudinal (Z) coordinate measurement is three times the average MSE XY. The use of corrections from reference stations turns out to be ineffective. No statistically significant relationship was proved between the PDOP value and the error of measurement of the position or height, and there was no significant relationship of the type of stand or stand density or the type of relief. By contrast, the age of stand was statistically significant and there are higher MSE XY values in older stands, depending, however, on the stand density.

Keywords: forest canopy impact; GPS; GPS device accuracy; location precision; mean square error; Trimble JUNO ST

Published: February 28, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Klimánek M. Analysis of the accuracy of GPS Trimble JUNO ST measurement in the conditions of forest canopy. J. For. Sci. 2010;56(2):84-91. doi: 10.17221/32/2009-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Bolstad P., Jenks A., Berkin J., Horne K., Reading W.H. (2005): A comparison of autonomous, WAAS, real-time and post-processed global positioning systems (GPS) accuracies in northern forests. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 22: 5-11 (in Czech). Go to original source...
  2. Hrdina Z., Pánek P., Vejražka F. (1996): Radio positioning (satellite system GPS). Praha, ČVUT: 267 (in Czech).
  3. Naesset E., Jonmeister T. (2002): Assessing point accuracy of DGPS under forest canopy before data acquisition, in the field, and after postprocessing. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 17: 351-358. Go to original source...
  4. Sigrist P., Coppin P., Hermy M. (1999): Impact of forest canopy on quality and accuracy of GPS measurements. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18: 3595-3610. Go to original source...
  5. Tuček J., Ligoš J. (2002): Forest canopy influence on the precision of location with GPS receivers. Journal of Forest Science, 48: 399-407. Go to original source...
  6. Wing M.G., Eklund A., Sessions J., Karsky R. (2008): Horizontal Measurement Performance of Five MappingGrade Global Positioning System Receiver Configurations in Several Forested Settings. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 23: 166-171. Go to original source...
  7. Wing M.G., Eklund A. (2008): Vertical Measurement Accuracy of Mapping-Grade Global Positioning Systems Receivers in Three Forest Settings. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 23: 83-88. Go to original source...
  8. Yang X., Brock R. (1996): Comparison between RDOP and PDOP. Proceedings of the 1996 American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote sensing, Baltimore, 22 to 25 April 1996, 2: 162-171.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.