J. For. Sci., 2014, 60(6):254-261 | DOI: 10.17221/84/2013-JFS

Economic evaluation of natural forest park using the travel cost method (case study; Masouleh forest park, north of Iran)Original Paper

S. Mohammadi Limaei1, H. Ghesmati1, R. Rashidi2, N.Yamini3
1 Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan, Someh Sara, Iran
2 Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan Branch, Iran
3 Office of Plans & Programming, Zanjan Regional Water Company, Zanjan, Iran

We evaluated recreational and socioeconomic values of Masouleh forest park, north of Iran. Travel Cost Method (TCM) or Clawson method was used for evaluation. Therefore, 96 questionnaires were distributed among the visitors. The results indicated that the variables such as travel time to the park, travel costs, age and education were effective variables in using the park. The results show that there is a significant relation between travel time and the number of visitors whereas by increasing travel time the number of visitors decreased. Furthermore, there is a significant relation between the number of visitors as a dependent variable and travel costs whereas when the travel cost increases, the number of visitors decreases. Results indicated that the willingness to pay decreased by increasing the entrance fee. The models estimated an average willingness to pay 12,500 Iranian Rials per visit. The results also indicated that the average round trip travel cost was 85.5 (10,000 Iranian Rials).

Keywords: willingness to pay; recreational value

Published: June 30, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mohammadi Limaei S, Ghesmati H, Rashidi R, Yamini N. Economic evaluation of natural forest park using the travel cost method (case study; Masouleh forest park, north of Iran). J. For. Sci. 2014;60(6):254-261. doi: 10.17221/84/2013-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Beal D.J. (1995): A travel cost analysis of the value of Carnarvon Gorge national park for recreational use. Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, 63: 292-303.
    2. Chen W., Hong H., Liu Y., Zhang L., Hou X., Raymond M. (2004): Recreation demands and economic value: an application of travel cost method for Xiamen Island. China Economics Review, 15: 398-406. Go to original source...
    3. Clawson M. (1959): Methods of Measuring the Demand for an Value of Outdoor Recreation. Washington, DC, Resources for the Future: 36.
    4. Clawson M., Knetch J.L. (1960): Economic of Outdoor Recreation. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press: 143.
    5. Clawson M., Knestsch J.L. (1966): Economics of Outdoor Recreation. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press: 348.
    6. Cochran W.G. (1977): Sampling Techniques. New York, John Wiley & Sons: 428.
    7. Dwyer J.F., Peterson G.L., Darragh A.J. (1983): Remove from marked records estimating the value of urban forests using the travel cost method. Journal of Arboriculture, 9: 182-185. Go to original source...
    8. Ecosystem Valuation (2013): Basic concepts of economic value. Available at http://www.ecosystemvaluation.org
    9. Environmental Justice Organisations (2013): Travel cost method. Available at http://www.ejolt.org/2013/01/travelcost-method/
    10. Enyew S. (2003): Valuation of the Benefits of Out-door Recreation Using the Travel Cost Method: the Case of Wabi-Shebele Langano Recreation Site. [MSc Thesis.] Adis Ababa, Adis Ababa University: 109.
    11. Hanley N., Spash C. (1993): Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment. Aldershot, OECD: 314.
    12. Herath G., Kennedy J. (2004): Estimating the economic value of Mount Buffalo national park with the travel cost and contingent valuation models. Tourism Economics, 10: 63-78. Go to original source...
    13. Knapman B., Stanley O. (1991): A Travel Cost Analysis of Recreation Use Value of Kadau National Park. Canberra, Resource Assessment Commission Inquiry: 42.
    14. Majnounian H. (1977): Economic Evaluation of Khazaneh Forest Park. [MSc Thesis.] Tehran, University of Tehran: 105.
    15. Mojabi M., Monavvari M. (2005): Economic valuation of Pardisan and Lavizan fores parks. Journal of Environment Science, 7: 63-71.
    16. Pishkari K., Esmaili Sari. A. (2007): Promenade - economic valuation of Taleghani forest park. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 3: 83-92.
    17. Rolfe J., Gregg D. (2012): Valuing beach recreation across a regional area: The Great Barrier Reef in Australia. Ocean & Coastal Management, 69: 282-290. Go to original source...
    18. Smith V.K. (1993): Nonmarket valuation of environmental resources: an interpretive appraisal. Land Economics, 69: 1-26. Go to original source...
    19. Stevens T.H., Allen P.G. (1980): Estimating the benefits of recreation under conditions of congestion congestion. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 7: 395-400. Go to original source...
    20. Soudi Shahabi S., Smaili Sari A. (2006): Estimation of promenade value of Anzali wetland by travel cost method (TCM). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 3: 61-69.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content