J. For. Sci., 2026, 72(3):119-135 | DOI: 10.17221/87/2025-JFS

Balancing conservation and intervention: Managing forest diebacks in Slovakia's Tatra National ParkOriginal Paper

Paula Puškárová1, Mikuláš Černota2,3, Ján Slivinský4
1 Faculty of Commerce, Bratislava University of Economics and Business, Bratislava, Slovakia
2 Faculty of International Relations, Bratislava University of Economics and Business, Bratislava, Slovakia
3 Laurea University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland
4 State Forests of TANAP, Tatranská Lomnica, Slovakia

Disturbance regimes in Central European mountain forests are changing under the ongoing climate change, raising questions about how protected areas should respond to increasingly frequent windthrow and bark beetle outbreaks. In Tatra National Park, a major windstorm in 2004 triggered a landscape-scale bark beetle eruption that challenged long-standing expectations that non-intervention alone could safeguard forest ecosystems. Using the Socio-Ecological Systems framework, we combined long-term field observations with archival sources and stakeholder interviews to examine how ecological dynamics, governance structures, and actor perspectives interacted during and after the outbreak. We show that warming, abundant post-storm breeding substrate, and legacy Norwegian spruce (Picea abies) monocultures reduced forest resilience and enabled successive beetle waves. Governance fragmentation led to delayed decision-making, allowing large volumes of wind-felled timber to remain untreated and facilitating its spread into high-naturalness stands. In contrast, evidence from other European countries suggests that timely, spatially focused measures can reduce outbreak duration without compromising conservation values. Our results indicate that in disturbance-prone, spruce-dominated forest systems experiencing climate change, a combination of strict protection in core areas and timely, selective measures in adjacent zones is more likely to maintain resilience and support conservation outcomes than strictly passive or fully interventionist approaches.

Keywords: climate change; forest disturbance; protected areas; socio-ecological systems

Received: November 28, 2025; Revised: February 23, 2026; Accepted: February 24, 2026; Published: March 31, 2026  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Puškárová P, Černota M, Slivinský J. Balancing conservation and intervention: Managing forest diebacks in Slovakia's Tatra National Park. Journal of Forest Science. 2026;72(3):119-135. doi: 10.17221/87/2025-JFS.
Download citation

Supplementary files:

Download file87-2025-JFS_ESM.pdf

File size: 48.68 kB

References

  1. Anderegg W.R.L., Konings A.G., Trugman A.T., Yu K., Bowling D.R., Gabbitas R., Karp D.S., Pacala S., Sperry J.S., Sulman B.N., Zenes N. (2018): Hydraulic diversity of forests regulates ecosystem resilience during drought. Nature, 561: 538-41. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Andráš J. (2015): Výkon ochrany lesa na území v obhospodarovaní ŠL TANAPu. Štúdie o Tatranskom národnom parku, 11: 41-46. (in Slovak)
  3. Andriollo E., Pisani E., Masiero M., Sitzia T., Campagnaro T. (2024): Detecting social-ecological fit in Natura 2000 governance and management: Evidence from LIFE projects focused on forest protected habitat types. People and Nature, 00: 1-20. Go to original source...
  4. Arksey M., O'Malley L. (2005): Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8: 19-32. Go to original source...
  5. Bakke A. (1989): The recent Ips typographus outbreak in Norway - Experiences from a control program. Holarctic Ecology, 12: 515-519. Go to original source...
  6. Barka I., Lukeš P., Bucha T., Hlásny T., Strejček R., Mlčoušek M., Křístek Š. (2018): Remote sensing-based forest health monitoring systems - Case studies from Czechia and Slovakia. Central European Forestry Journal, 64: 259-275.
  7. Bičárová S., Mačutek J., Bilčík D. (2014): Climate of submontane location Stará Lesná (1988-2013). Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, 44: 95-113. Go to original source...
  8. Blicharska M., Angelstam P., Giessen L., Hilszczański J., Hermanowicz E., Holeksa J., Jacobsen J.B., Jaroszewicz B., Konczal A., Konieczny A., Mikusiński G., Mirek Z., Mohren F., Muys B., Niedziałkowski K., Sotirov M., Stereńczak K., Szwagrzyk J., Winder G.M., Witkowski Z., Zaplata R., Winkel G. (2020): Between biodiversity conservation and sustainable forest management - A multidisciplinary assessment of the emblematic Białowieża Forest case. Biological Conservation, 248: 108614. Go to original source...
  9. Brodrechtova Y., Navrátil R., Sedmák R., Tuček J. (2018): Using the politicized IAD framework to assess integrated forest management decision-making in Slovakia. Land Use Policy, 79: 1001-1013. Go to original source...
  10. Dobor L., Hlásny T., Rammer W., Zimová S., Barka I., Seidl R. (2020): Is salvage logging effectively dampening bark beetle outbreaks and preserving forest carbon stocks? Journal of Applied Ecology, 57: 67-76. Go to original source...
  11. Eidmann H.H. (1983): Management of the spruce barkbeetle Ips typographus in Scandinavia using pheromones. In: 10th International Congress of Plant Protection, Brighton, Nov 20-25, 1983: 1042-1050.
  12. Ezquerro M., Diaz-Balteiro L., Pardos M. (2023): Implications of forest management on the conservation of protected areas: A new proposal in Central Spain. Forest Ecology and Management, 548: 121428. Go to original source...
  13. Fleischer P., Koreň M., Škvarenina J., Kunca V. (2009): Risk assessment of the Tatra Mountains forest. In: Střelcová K., Csaba M., Kleidon A., Lapin M., Matejka F., Blaženec M., Škvarenina J., Holécy J. (eds): Bioclimatology and Natural Hazards. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands: 145-154. Go to original source...
  14. Fleischer P., Pichler V., Fleischer P. Jr., Holko L., Máliš F., Gömöryová E., Cudlín P., Holeksa J., Michalová Z., Homolová Z., Škvarenina J., Střelcová K., Hlaváč P. (2017): Forest ecosystem services affected by natural disturbances, climate and land-use changes in the Tatra Mountains. Climate Research, 73: 57-71. Go to original source...
  15. Gilmour D. (2016): Forty Years of Community-Based Forestry: A Review of its Extent and Effectiveness. FAO Forestry Paper No. 176. Rome, FAO: 140.
  16. Gregor K., Reyer C., Nagel T.A., Mäkelä A., Krause A., Knoke T., Ramming A. (2024): Reconciling the EU forest, biodiversity and climate strategies. Global Change Biology, 30: e17431. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Grodzki W., Jakuš R., Lajzová E., Sitková Z., Maczka T., Škvarenina J. (2006): Effects of intensive versus no management strategies during an outbreak of the bark beetle Ips typographus in the Tatra Mts. in Poland and Slovakia. Annals of Forest Science, 63: 55-61. Go to original source...
  18. Guerrero A., Wilson K.A. (2017): Using a social-ecological framework to inform the implementation of conservation plans. Conservation Biology, 31: 290-301. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Hanewinkel M., Hummel S., Albrecht A. (2011): Assessing natural hazards in forestry for risk management: A review. European Journal of Forest Research, 130: 329-351. Go to original source...
  20. Heshmatol Vaezin S.M., Marage D., Garcia S. (2022): Cost-effectiveness of Natura 2000 forest contracts for biodiversity conservation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 52: 1527-1542. Go to original source...
  21. Hlásny T., Turčáni M. (2013): Persisting bark beetle outbreak indicates the unsustainability of secondary Norway spruce forests: Case study from Central Europe. Annals of Forest Science, 70: 481-491. Go to original source...
  22. Hlásny T., Krokene P., Liebhold A., Montagné-Huck C., Müller J., Qin H., Raffa K., Schelhaas M.J., Seidl R., Svoboda M., Viiri H. (2019): Living with Bark Beetles: Impacts, Outlook and Management Options. From Science to Policy 8. Joensuu, European Forest Institute: 52. Go to original source...
  23. Holling C.S., Meffe G.K. (1996): Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology, 10: 328-337. Go to original source...
  24. Jakuš R. (1998): A method for the protection of spruce stands against Ips typographus by the use of barriers of pheromone traps in north-eastern Slovakia. Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde, Pflanzenschutz, Umweltschutz, 71: 152-158. Go to original source...
  25. Jandl R., Haeler E., Kindermann G.E., Lapin K., Oettel J., Schüler S. (2024): Management and biodiversity conservation in Central European forests. Trees, Forests and People, 17: 100601. Go to original source...
  26. Jönsson A.M., Harding S., Bärring L., Ravn H.P. (2007): Impact of climate change on the population dynamics of Ips typographus in southern Sweden. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 146: 70-81. Go to original source...
  27. Kerner D.A., Thomas J.S. (2014): Resilience attributes of social-ecological systems: Framing metrics for management. Resources, 3: 672-702. Go to original source...
  28. Konczal A.A., Derks J., de Koning J.H.C., Winkel G. (2023): Integrating nature conservation measures in European forest management - An exploratory study of barriers and drivers in 9 European countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 325: 116619. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Koreň M. (2015): K stavu a vývoju lesov TANAPu v historických súvislostiach. Štúdie o Tatranskom národnom parku, 11: 59 - 74. (in Slovak)
  30. Korpeľ Š. (1988): Pralesy Slovenska. Bratislava, Veda: 332. (in Slovak)
  31. Krajčovič A. (1996): K histórii obhospodarovania lesov v javorinskej oblasti. Štúdie o Tatranskom národnom parku, 1: 137-177. (in Slovak)
  32. Křenová Z., Polak P. (2007): Hodnotenie dokumentu NPR Tichá a Kôprová - Štúdia posúdenia vplyvu navrhovanej činnosti na priaznivý stav predmetu ochrany. Štátna ochrana prírody SR. Bratislava, WWF. (in Slovak)
  33. Křenová Z., Kindlmann P. (2017): Natura 2000 - Solution for Eastern Europe or just a good start? The Šumava National Park as a test case. Biological Conservation, 186: 268-275. Go to original source...
  34. Kulakowski D., Seidl R., Holeksa J., Kuuluvainen T., Nagel T.A., Panayotov M., Svoboda M., Thorn S., Vacchiano G., Whitlock C., Wohlgemuth T., Bebi P. (2017): A walk on the wild side: Disturbance dynamics and the conservation and management of European mountain forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management, 388: 120-131. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Kunca A., Zúbrik M. (2006): Vetrová kalamita 19. novembra 2004. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284168254_Vetrova_kalamita_z_19_novembra_2004 (in Slovak)
  36. Kunca A., Galko J., Zúbrik M., Vakula J., Gubka A., Leontovyč R., Lalík M., Longauerová V., Rell S., Konôpka B., Nikolov C., Maľová M., Dubec M. (2025): Forest Health in Slovakia in 2024 and Prognosis for 2025. APOL, 6: 3-10.
  37. Långström B., Lindelöw A., Schroeder M., Björklund N., Öhrn P. (2009): The spruce bark beetle outbreak in Sweden following the January-storms in 2005 and 2007. In: Proceedings of the 9th Workshop of IUFRO WG 7.03.10 on Methodology of Forest Insect and Disease Survey in Central Europe, Štrbské Pleso, Sept 15-19, 2008: 8. Available at: https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/5076/
  38. Lenton T.M., Held H., Kriegler E., Hall J.W., Lucht W., Rahmstorf S., Schnellnhuber H.J. (2008): Tipping elements in the Earth's climate system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105: 1786-1793. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Leverkus A.B., Buma B., Wagenbrenner J., Burton P.J., Lingua E., Marzano R., Thorn S. (2021): Tamm review: Does salvage logging mitigate subsequent forest disturbances? Forest Ecology and Management, 481: 118721. Go to original source...
  40. Lopatka J. (2019a): Climate change to blame as bark beetles ravage central Europe's forests. Prague, Reuters. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-centraleurope-environment-barkbeetle/climate-change-to-blame-as-bark-beetles-ravage-central-europes-forests-idUSKCN1S21LA
  41. Lopatka J. (2019b): Czech forest owners face $1.7 billion loss this year from bark beetle crisis. Euronews by Reuters. Available at: https://www.euronews.com/2019/10/07/czech-forest-owners-face-1-point-7-billion-loss-this-year-from-bark-beetle-crisis
  42. McGinnis M.D., Ostrom E. (2014): Social-ecological system framework: Initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and Society, 19: 1-12. Go to original source...
  43. Meier F., Forster B., Engesser R. (2009): Borkenkäfer - Die Buchdrucker-Situation beruhigt sich. Waldschutz aktuell, Vol. 1/2009. Birmensdorf, Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt WSL: 3. Available at: https://www.dora.lib4ri.ch/wsl/item/wsl:14295 (in German)
  44. Mezei P., Blaženec M., Grodzki W., Škvarenina J., Jakuš R. (2017a): Influence of different forest protection strategies on spruce tree mortality during a bark beetle outbreak. Annals of Forest Science, 74: 65. Go to original source...
  45. Mezei P., Jakuš R., Pennerstorfer J., Havašová M., Škvarenina J., Ferenčík J., Slivinský J., Bičárová S., Bilčík D., Blaženec M., Netherer S. (2017b): Storms, temperature maxima and the Eurasian spruce bark beetle Ips typographus - An infernal trio in Norway spruce forests of the Central European High Tatra Mountains. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 242: 85-95. Go to original source...
  46. Michalová Z., Morrissey R.C., Wohlgemuth T., Bače R., Fleischer P., Svoboda M. (2017): Salvage-logging after windstorm leads to structural and functional homogenization of understory layer and delayed spruce tree recovery in Tatra Mts., Slovakia. Forests, 8: 88. Go to original source...
  47. Mika L., Schwarz M. et al. (2007): Study assessing the influence of proposed measures on the favourable status of objects of conservation in Tichá and Kôprová Valley National Nature Reserves. Slovak State Nature Conservation Agency and National Forestry Centre. Deposited at WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme Office, Vienna. (unpublished manuscript)
  48. Moravčík M., Novotný J., Toma P. (2007): National Forest Programme of the Slovak Republic 2007. Bratislava and Zvolen, Ministry of Agriculture of the Slovak Republic and National Forest Centre - Forest Research Institute Zvolen: 63.
  49. Morris J.L., Cottrell S., Fettig C.J., DeRose R.J., Mattor K.M., Carter V.A., Clear J., Clement J., Hansen W.D., Hicke J.A., Higuera P.E., Seddon A.W.R., Seppä H., Sherriff R.L., Stednick J.D., Seybold S.J. (2018): Bark beetles as agents of change in social-ecological systems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16: S34-S43. Go to original source...
  50. Müller M., Knoke T., Olschewski R. (2019): Can existing estimates for ecosystem service values inform forest management? Forests, 10: 132. Go to original source...
  51. Nakagawa S., Samarasinghe G., Haddaway N.R., Westgate M.J., O'Dea R.E., Noble D.W.A., Lagisz M. (2019): Research weaving: Visualizing the future of research synthesis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 34: 224-238. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  52. Netherer S., Schopf A. (2010): Potential effects of climate change on insect herbivores in European forests - General aspects and the pine processionary moth as specific example. Forest Ecology and Management, 259: 831-838. Go to original source...
  53. Ostrom E. (2007): A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104: 15181-15187. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  54. Ostrom E. (2009): A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325: 419-422. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  55. Palomo I., Montes C., Martín-López B., González J.A., García-Llorente M., Alcorlo P., García Mora M.R. (2014): Incorporating the social-ecological approach in protected areas in the Anthropocene. BioScience, 64: 181-191. Go to original source...
  56. Papánek F. (1978): Teória a prax funkčne integrovaného lesného hospodárstva. Lesnícke štúdie 29. Bratislava, Príroda: 218. (in Slovak)
  57. Peters M.D.J., Godfrey C.M., Khalil H., McInerney P., Parker D., Soares C.B. (2015): Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13: 141-146. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  58. Plesník P. (1979): Prírodné pomery územia Tatranského národného parku. In: Strnka M., Matuský V. (eds): Lesné hospodárstvo Tatranského národného parku. Košice, Východoslovenské vydavateľstvo: 51 - 161. (in Slovak)
  59. Potterf M., Nikolov C., Kočická E., Ferenčík J., Mezei P., Jakuš R. (2019): Landscape-level spread of beetle infestations from windthrown- and beetle-killed trees in the non-intervention zone of the Tatra National Park, Slovakia (Central Europe). Forest Ecology and Management, 432: 489-500. Go to original source...
  60. Reyer C., Brouwers N., Rammig A., Brook B.W., Epila J., Grant R., Holmgren M., Langerwisch F., Leuzinger S., Lucht W., Medlyn B., Pfeifer M., Steinkamp J., Vanderwel M.C., Verbeeck H., Villela D.M. (2015): Forest resilience and tipping points at different spatio-temporal scales: Approaches and challenges. Journal of Ecology, 103: 5-15. Go to original source...
  61. Romagnoli F., Masiero M., Secco L. (2022): Windstorm impacts on forest-related socio-ecological systems: An analysis from a socio-economic and institutional perspective. Forests, 13: 939. Go to original source...
  62. Schröter H., Becker T., Weigerstorfer D., Veit H. (2004): Waldschutzprobleme nach "Lothar". In: Landesforstverwaltung Baden-Württemberg (ed.): Orkan "Lothar" - Bewältigung der Sturmschäden in den Wäldern Baden-Württembergs: Dokumentation, Analyse, Konsequenzen. Schriftenreihe der LFV Baden-Württemberg 83. Freiburg im Breisgau, Forstliche Versuchs- und Forschungsanstalt Baden-Württemberg: 341-370. (in German)
  63. Seguin R., Delbar V., Batista e Silva F., Mouillot D. (2024): Protected areas shape the distribution of tourism across rural Europe. People and Nature, 6: 2246-2260. Go to original source...
  64. Seidl R., Rammer W. (2017): Climate change amplifies the interactions between wind and bark beetle disturbances in forest landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 32: 1485-498. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  65. Senf C., Seidl R. (2021): Mapping the forest disturbance regimes of Europe. Nature Sustainability, 4: 63-70. Go to original source...
  66. Sitková Z., Šebeň V., Rybár J. (2025): Impact of management and short-term growth prospects of different tree species from combined regeneration of forest stands in the High Tatra Mts. APOL, 6: 166-172.
  67. Sommerfeld A., Senf C., Buma B., D'Amato A.W., Després T., Díaz-Hormazábal I., Fraver S., Frelich L.E., Gutiérrez Á.G., Hart S.J., Harvey B.J., He H.S., Hlásny T., Holz A., Kitzberger T., Kulakowski D., Lindenmayer D., Mori A.S., Müller J., Paritsis J., Perry G.L.W., Stephens S.L., Svoboda M., Turner M.G., Veblen T.T., Seidl R. (2018): Patterns and drivers of recent disturbances across the temperate biome. Nature Communications, 9: 4355. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  68. Sotirov M., Arts B. (2018): Integrated forest governance in Europe: An introduction to the special issue on forest policy integration and integrated forest management. Land Use Policy, 79: 960-967. Go to original source...
  69. Sousa-Silva R., Verheyen K., Ponette Q., Bay E., Sioen G., Titeux H., Van de Peer T., Van Meerbeek K., Muys B. (2018): Tree diversity mitigates defoliation after a drought-induced tipping point. Global Change Biology, 24: 4304-4315. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  70. State Forests of TANAP (2019): TANAP v kategórii národného parku IUCN. Available at: http://spravatanap.sk/web/index.php/aktualne-sk/11-slovak/aktualne/288-tanap-v-kategorii-narodneho-parku-iucn (accessed May 10, 2020; in Slovak)
  71. Steyrer G., Krenmayer W., Schaffer H. (2011): Dokumentation der Waldschädigungsfaktoren (DWF). Forstschutz Aktuell, 52: 21-24. (in German)
  72. Stokstad E. (2017): Last stands. Science, 358:1240-1243. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  73. Thom D., Seidl R. (2016): Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests. Biological Reviews, 91: 760-781. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  74. Thom D., Seidl R., Steyrer G., Krehan H., Formayer H. (2013): Slow and fast drivers of the natural disturbance regime in central European forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management, 307: 293-302. Go to original source...
  75. Thonicke K., Bahn M., Lavorel S., Bardgett R.D., Erb K., Giamberini M., Reichstein M., Vollan B., Rammig A. (2020): Advancing the understanding of adaptive capacity of social-ecological systems to absorb climate extremes. Earth's Future 2020, 8: e2019EF001221. Go to original source...
  76. Tiebel M., Moelder A., Plieninger T. (2021): Small-scale private forest owners and the European Natura 2000 conservation network: Perceived ecosystem services, management practices, and nature conservation attitudes. European Journal of Forest Research, 140: 1515-1531. Go to original source...
  77. Topercer J. (2010): Princípy a kritériá zónovania národných parkov a ich rola v dlhodobom vývoji krajiny na príklade Tatranského národného parku (SR). In: Nováček P., Huba M. (eds): Udržitelný rozvoj - Stav a perspektivy v roce 2010. Conference Proceedings of the Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Oct 6-8, 2010: 199-212. (in Slovak)
  78. Vacchiano G., Berretti R., Mondino E.B., Meloni F., Motta R. (2016): Assessing the effect of disturbances on the functionality of direct protection forests. Mountain Research and Development, 36: 41-55. Go to original source...
  79. Wiersma Y.F., Duinker P.N., Haider W., Hvenegaard G.T., Schmiegelow F.K.A. (2010): The Relationship between Protected Areas and Sustainable Forest Management: Many Shades of Green. A state of Knowledge Report. Edmonton, Sustainable Forest Management Network: 60.
  80. World Bank (2013): Managing Forest Resources for Sustainable Development: An Evaluation of World Bank Group Experience. IEG WB No. 66751. Washington, DC, World Bank: 175. Available at: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/746731468320669699/pdf/Managing-forest-resources-for-sustainable-development-an-evaluation-of-the-World-Bank-Groups-experience.pdf
  81. Zach P. (2008): Bark beetle dynamics after wind disturbance in Tatra Mountains, West Carpathians. In: Gratzer G., Kempter I. (eds): Mountain Forests in a Changing World. Advances in Research on Sustainable Management and the Role of Academic Education. Vienna, UNI BOKU: 59-60.
  82. Zielonka T., Malcher P. (2009): The dynamics of a mountain mixed forest under wind disturbances in the Tatra Mountains, central Europe - A dendroecological reconstruction. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 39: 2215-2223. Go to original source...
  83. Zýval V., Křenová Z., Kindlmann P. (2016): Conservation implications of forest changes caused by bark beetle management in the Šumava National Park. Biological Conservation, 204, Part B: 394-40. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0.), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.